Every MAP engagement follows the same logic: low-commitment entry, structured diagnosis, matched solution.
We don’t skip steps. We don’t start with a proposal.
We start with a conversation.
90-min diagnostic working session.
10–14 day deep dive.
One clear constraint.
Matched to what the diagnostic finds.
EO and key decision-makers. Pre-work submitted 48 hours prior: investor deck, financial snapshot, org chart, top 3 concerns. MAP walks in with context — not questions. You leave knowing what MAP sees — regardless of whether you proceed. Credit-back toward next engagement within 30 days.
Leadership interviews, operational review, network analysis, synthesis workshop.
Output: 10–20 page diagnostic built to be read in 30 minutes and actioned in the next 30.
One clear MAP recommendation. Not a thick report designed to look thorough.
MAP’s engagements are value-based and scoped to the specific situation. The Executive Clarity Session is where we determine fit, define the problem, and recommend the right path. Pricing follows from there.
MAP embeds directly inside the leadership team as an operating partner with a defined accountability role. Milestone-anchored, not hour-billed. Monthly Systemic Audit built in. The only solution that's structurally hard to replicate - bespoke and limited availability.
A specific, well-defined problem: GTM redesign, leadership structure reconfiguration, operating model restructure, AI workflow architecture redesign. Structured, fast, decisive. Best when the problem is known and needs resolution without months of consulting drag.
Operating priority framework, leadership alignment plan, 90-day execution roadmap. Best for post-raise clarity, pre-pivot framing, or alignment before speed. The roadmap has named owners and lead indicators — it's a decision architecture, not a strategy deck.
The proprietary methodology behind every engagement. Five phases, compound logic. The core premise: most organizations don’t lack effort — they lack alignment around the signal that actually drives scalable value.
Isolate the single dominant enterprise signal. What actually drives value — and where is it being diluted?
Define non-negotiables, hidden misalignments, capital constraints. What must be true — and what’s violating it?
Force alignment on leadership behavior, incentive structures, narrative. Are leaders truly aligned on what drives value?
Hardwire alignment through decision rights, KPIs, governance, operating cadence. Does the system reinforce the strategy?
Convert signal to enterprise value through growth pathways, organizational design, talent leverage. Scale only after alignment is structural.